A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours about the construction of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which is partially created, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the internet site grew to become Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt construction pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant in the legal timeline.
At the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of preparing files, maps, and disorders attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is motivated by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already carried out determined by Experienced advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty unique Specialist backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical fact of the coastline and also the symbolic character from the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the result remains uncertain. The court need to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other very long once the lawful expenditures are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns for example environmental safety and home rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Whether or not it's going to finally be altered, eliminated, or concluded as planned will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely proceed to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.